In Focus: Rural business grants and funding

The latest of the CLA’s In Focus article series – a thorough review of the ways in which rural enterprises can secure funding to help boost revenue streams
village cumbria

Article highlights

  • To maintain economic growth in rural areas, the provision of capital and revenue grants acts as a stimulator for increased productivity and aids innovation;
  • The Rural England Prosperity Fund (REPF) replaced the previous EU rural development funds with the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) replacing the EU regional and social funds;
  • Delivery of the REPF has been patchy, leading to inconsistent approaches and problems in fully spending REPF budgetary allocations;
  • There are a variety of different rural business grants that cover, diversification, innovation in new products and business start-ups;
  • Applicants for rural business grants must ensure that they meet the eligibility requirements as well as other grant conditions;
  • Grant values can vary widely, often depending on the objectives by the respective local authorities;
  • All grants will require an element of match funding, the level of private investment depending on the objectives being pursued;
  • Financial loans are available from traditional sources, such as the retail banks, in addition to loans from the British Business Bank.

Introduction

For rural businesses to grow, they will often require funding. This could be in the form of grants or loans. History shows that rural businesses are resilient and have recognised business opportunities through diversification. However, to be able to exploit these opportunities, they require public support to develop further.

This In Focus article explains the different types of grants available within the present UK Government grant schemes in England. In addition, it explores several different funding streams that allow rural businesses to expand.

Rural development: the Growth Programme and LEADER

When the UK was a member state of the European Union it was allocated funds towards furthering rural development. During the final Rural Development Programme for England (RDPE) it was allocated £350m over a seven year period (2014 – 2020), that is £50m per year.

These funds were targeted towards two different programmes: the Growth Programme and LEADER. The Growth Programme was targeted towards larger projects with a minimum grant value of £35,000. For LEADER, projects were more socio-economic in character with a maximum grant limit of £35,000.

The UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF)

The UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) replaces the EU’s structural fund through the regional and social fund schemes. It is UK-wide with a budget of around £800m per year. It is a revenue grant scheme (not capital) and is targeted mainly for disadvantaged areas that were previously Objective 5b areas, such as Cornwall and large parts of Wales.

Rural businesses are eligible to apply for revenue funding but experience has seen that this tends to be an untapped resource although it can be difficult to access. As with the Rural England Prosperity Fund (REPF), it is administered and delivered by local authorities. Importantly, many local authorities have joined the UKSPF with the REPF which can create confusion as to which grants are available.

The Rural England Prosperity Fund (REPF)

Following the UK’s exit from the EU, the government decided to the available rural development budget to create a new capital grants scheme for rural business and community projects. The REPF went into operation from 1 April 2023 for a two-year period, ending on 31 March 2025, worth £110m over this period. Whereas under the RDPE, funds were allocated and delivered centrally through the Rural Payments Agency, the REPF is a devolved scheme involving some 117 local authorities in England. Each local authority has been allocated a budget and this is set out in Annex 1 below.

This change in delivery and administration has caused a number of difficulties, mainly due to 117 different approaches being undertaken by the respective local authorities. Although Defra set out guidance on the priorities and aims of the REPF, many local authorities have been bedevilled with problems in failing to understand the needs of rural businesses and, in a wider sense, a failure to understand the rural economy.

Nevertheless, several different grant schemes, targeted at different types of project, have been launched and these are explained below.

Rural Business Enterprise Grants

It is important to understand that there are different types of business grants available. This means that together with different objectives, there are different criteria that apply. When we look at rural business enterprise grants they can cover a range of different business types including:

  • Existing tourism businesses seeking to expand, for example, building new self-catering units;
  • New and existing businesses that are looking to develop new products for market that involve innovative processes and technologies;
  • Businesses in niche markets, particularly those seeking to open up new markets.

The projects for which the grant might be used for include:

  • Manufacturing activities and equipment;
  • Purchase of equipment for food processing for non-farmer-owned businesses only;
  • New builds/converting /altering buildings to other uses, for example, manufacturing/office;
  • Creation and improvements of leisure/tourism businesses - adding value to the visitor experience.

It is important to note that grants of this nature will need to be match funded. This means that the value of the grant will not cover the cost of the entire project but a certain percentage, usually in the region of 40% or 50%. As such, the business will have to match fund the remaining cost. For example, a project costs £80,000. The grant value is 50% or £40,000. The match fund is therefore 50% or £40,000.

Rural Business Start-Up Grants

A number of local authorities are putting in place start-up grants that help diversification and new projects the ability to start trading. These grants can vary in size, usually between £2,000 and £5,000 and are normally targeted at small, micro and sole traders. These are businesses with less than 49 employees.

The actual provision of start-up grants very much depends on the objectives and investment plans of local authorities. In general, provision will be made to support micro and sole trader start-up businesses. Applicants for start-up grants, where they are available, need to ensure that they meet all the eligibility criteria.

Rural Business Diversification Grants

Since the big government push in 2001 to encourage greater diversification, more and more rural businesses have recognised the importance of this route. In the main, rural diversification has tended to focus on tourism projects which can add a further income stream to the main business operation.

However, rural businesses are expanding their operations into other diversified sectors, one such being outdoor events like wedding venues and functions. A diversification grant can be a great assistance to these types of diversifications but it is important for all applicants for these grants to ensure that the value of the grant is sufficient for the proposed project given that funding is for capital works only.

Conditions for a successful grant

As noted above, rural business grants do not cover the total cost of the project but will require match funding. There are a number of other conditions those seeking business grants need to consider, including:

  • An application can only use one type of grant for a project. For example, an application can be made for a rural business diversification project but it cannot then apply for another grant from another source for the same project. This is known as “double funding” and is not permitted;
  • The proposed project must take place in the location of the respective local authority. An applicant is not able to apply for rural business grants outside of their local authority boundary;
  • Those applying for a grant will, in most cases, have to complete an ‘Expression of Interest’ which will then determine whether the applicant will be asked to put forward a full application;
  • It is important that anyone seeking to apply for a rural business grant seek advice from their local authority (through the website) to ensure that firstly, grants are available and secondly, to make sure that they are eligible.

Funding streams for rural businesses

Rural businesses should not just rely on grant funding to expand operations but also look at other types of funding streams, such as business loans. Apart from loans from high street retail banks, the British Business Banks identifies 12 different finance types as follows:

  • Angel Investment: These investors act as mentors and invest their own money in early-stage businesses for a share in the company;
  • Venture capital where investment is made in businesses with high growth potential;
  • Equity crowdfunding where investors through a digital platform buy shares in a business to enable business growth;
  • Private equity: This is where existing private equity companies invest in established businesses in return for a large or controlling stake to help the business reach the next level of growth;
  • Overdraft: Many rural businesses already use a bank’s overdraft facility where interest is paid on the overdraft amount;
  • Term loans: This is where a business borrows from a loan provider, such as a bank, and where the loan is paid back over an agreed fixed term with interest;
  • Start-Up loan: These are backed by the government and assist those beginning new businesses;
  • Asset-based lending: Finance is secured against the existing assets, such as machinery and property that acts as collateral;
  • Invoice finance: This is where businesses borrow against unpaid invoices, which provides funding before the invoices are paid;
  • Peer-to-Peer lending: This is where finance is provided over the internet. Both the loan and interest are paid back over an agreed period;
  • Leasing and hire purchase: Businesses buy assets and pay back over a fixed period;
  • Mezzanine finance: This is where businesses access unsecured loans – these will be a mix between equity and debt financing.

Anyone seeking funding from alternative finance streams and providers should always seek professional financial advice.

Annex 1: Allocation of funding per local authority under the REPF

South West

Local Authority Amount of Funding Authority Type
West of England £827,943 Mayoral Combined Authority
Cornwall and Isles of Scilly £5,567,556 Unitary Authority
Dorset £2,066,918 Unitary Authority
North Somerset £442,617 Unitary Authority
Wiltshire £2,649,324 Unitary Authority
Cotswold £764,292 Lower Tier Authority
East Devon £854,298 Lower Tier Authority
Forest of Dean £614,444 Lower Tier Authority
Mid Devon £816,672 Lower Tier Authority
North Devon £1,091,259 Lower Tier Authority
South Hams £843,317 Lower Tier Authority
Stroud £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Teignbridge £650,332 Lower Tier Authority
Tewkesbury £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Torridge £995,347 Lower Tier Authority
West Devon £838,551 Lower Tier Authority
Somerset £3,426,745 Upper Tier Authority

South East

Local Authority Amount of Funding Authority Type
Buckinghamshire £1,828,695 Unitary Authority
Isle of Wight £536,049 Unitary Authority
Medway £400,000 Unitary Authority
West Berkshire £597,994 Unitary Authority
Ashford £593,508 Lower Tier Authority
Basingstoke and Deane £439,567 Lower Tier Authority
Cherwell £526,831 Lower Tier Authority
Chichester £718,472 Lower Tier Authority
Dover £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
East Hampshire £490,618 Lower Tier Authority
Folkestone and Hythe £571,471 Lower Tier Authority
Guildford £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Horsham £871,733 Lower Tier Authority
Maidstone £539,728 Lower Tier Authority
New Forest £540,115 Lower Tier Authority
Sevenoaks £501,308 Lower Tier Authority
South Oxfordshire £733,241 Lower Tier Authority
Swale £502,995 Lower Tier Authority
Tandridge £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Test Valley £514,097 Lower Tier Authority
Tonbridge and Malling £447,450 Lower Tier Authority
Tunbridge Wells £443,604 Lower Tier Authority
Vale of White Horse £528,032 Lower Tier Authority
Waverley £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Wealden £838,120 Lower Tier Authority
West Oxfordshire £716,216 Lower Tier Authority
Winchester £745,096 Lower Tier Authority
Rother £603,963 Lower Tier Authority

East

Local Authority Amount of Funding Authority Type
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough £3,215,148 Mayoral Combined Authority
Bedford £552,352 Unitary Authority
Central Bedfordshire £1,061,854 Unitary Authority
North Lincolnshire £789,520 Unitary Authority
North Northamptonshire £1,161,812 Unitary Authority
West Northamptonshire £1,367,953 Unitary Authority
Babergh £621,369 Lower Tier Authority
Bassetlaw £714,251 Lower Tier Authority
Boston £429,355 Lower Tier Authority
Braintree £589,191 Lower Tier Authority
Breckland £1,041,797 Lower Tier Authority
Broadland £569,552 Lower Tier Authority
Chelmsford £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Colchester £532,195 Lower Tier Authority
East Hertfordshire £472,841 Lower Tier Authority
East Lindsey £1,791,546 Lower Tier Authority
East Suffolk £1,129,881 Lower Tier Authority
Epping Forest £437,136 Lower Tier Authority
Great Yarmouth £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
King's Lynn and West Norfolk £1,496,455 Lower Tier Authority
Maldon £430,328 Lower Tier Authority
Mid Suffolk £821,658 Lower Tier Authority
Newark and Sherwood £891,417 Lower Tier Authority
North Kestevan £747,556 Lower Tier Authority
North Norfolk £1,457,851 Lower Tier Authority
Rushcliffe £596,193 Lower Tier Authority
South Holland £699,884 Lower Tier Authority
South Kestevan £540,460 Lower Tier Authority
South Norfolk £915,788 Lower Tier Authority
Tendring £659,335 Lower Tier Authority
Uttlesford £813,487 Lower Tier Authority
West Lindsey £795,821 Lower Tier Authority
West Suffolk £753,701 Lower Tier Authority

Midlands

Local Authority Amount of Funding Authority Type
Cheshire East £827,627 Unitary Authority
Cheshire West and Chester £992,101 Unitary Authority
Herefordshire £1,705,669 Unitary Authority
Rutland £400,000 Unitary Authority
Shropshire £2,589,503 Unitary Authority
Bolsover £427,884 Lower Tier Authority
Derbyshire Dales £748,737 Lower Tier Authority
Harborough £709,681 Lower Tier Authority
High Peak £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Hinckley and Bosworth £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Lichfield £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Malvern Hills £500,624 Lower Tier Authority
Melton £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
North Warwickshire £495,639 Lower Tier Authority
North West Leicestershire £468,090 Lower Tier Authority
South Derbyshire £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
South Staffordshire £489,391 Lower Tier Authority
Stafford £487,936 Lower Tier Authority
Staffordshire Moorlands £410,353 Lower Tier Authority
Stratford-on-Avon £1,015,179 Lower Tier Authority
Wychavon £819,286 Lower Tier Authority

North

Local Authority Amount of Funding Authority Type
North of Tyne £3,043,546 Mayoral Combined Authority
South Yorkshire £1,434,307 Mayoral Combined Authority
Tees Valley £624,909 Mayoral Combined Authority
West Yorkshire £2,567,501 Mayoral Combined Authority
County Durham £3,512,301 Unitary Authority
East Riding of Yorkshire £1,801,827 Unitary Authority
York £400,000 Unitary Authority
Allerdale £1,298,210 Lower Tier Authority
Carlisle £474,841 Lower Tier Authority
Chorley £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Copeland £756,854 Lower Tier Authority
Eden £1,051,689 Lower Tier Authority
Lancaster £500,075 Lower Tier Authority
Ribble Valley £433,680 Lower Tier Authority
South Lakeland £1,137,962 Lower Tier Authority
West Lancashire £441,630 Lower Tier Authority
Wyre £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
North Yorkshire £5,417,114 Upper Tier Authority
Local Authority Amount of Funding Authority Type
North of Tyne £3,043,546 Mayoral Combined Authority
South Yorkshire £1,434,307 Mayoral Combined Authority
Tees Valley £624,909 Mayoral Combined Authority
West Yorkshire £2,567,501 Mayoral Combined Authority
County Durham £3,512,301 Unitary Authority
East Riding of Yorkshire £1,801,827 Unitary Authority
York £400,000 Unitary Authority
Allerdale £1,298,210 Lower Tier Authority
Carlisle £474,841 Lower Tier Authority
Chorley £400,000 Lower Tier Authority
Copeland £756,854 Lower Tier Authority
Eden £1,051,689 Lower Tier Authority
Lancaster £500,075 Lower Tier Authority
Ribble Valley £433,680 Lower Tier Authority

Key contact:

Charles Trotman
Charles Trotman Senior Economics and Rural Business Adviser, London